H.R. 1526 (119th): No Rogue Rulings Act or NORRA

The No Rogue Rulings Act (NORRA), H.R. 1526 in the 119th Congress, would limit federal district courts' authority to issue injunctions. Under the bill, a district court could issue an injunction only if it applies solely to the parties in the particular case before the court. The source metadata provides no latest action, policy area, or floor outcome.

Theological note: The bill concerns how courts exercise equitable remedies and the scope of judicial authority, which bears on civil justice, the rule of law, and due regard for those who may be wronged by unlawful government action. Scripture's concern for justice and for the vulnerable makes remedy design relevant, but the bill does not itself directly advance or restrain a named moral evil, so this is an issue of prudential governance rather than a final moral verdict.

• Tier: no Tier 1 record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
• Lane: federal_courts. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
• Lane: judicial_remedies. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
• Lane: separation_of_powers. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
• Lane: unclear. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
• Tier 1 sign-off: no record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
• Stored polarity: mixed. Only tags the rules mark scoreable on a mixed bill are scored. A yea can draw a penalty or a credit according to the tag. A nay on a tag scored as good can draw a penalty.
• Roll 97: On Motion to Recommit. Vote type: recommit.
• Roll 98: On Passage. Vote type: final_passage.
• Polarity rationale: Reviewed enrichment (llm_import) polarity: The measure is a structural judicial-remedy bill. It has a defensible prudential case about limiting the reach of court orders and separation of powers, but it also raises a real concern that restricting relief to named parties could leave non-party individuals harmed by unlawful action without timely protection. It does not directly advance a named moral evil or directly defend a named good, so 'mixed' fits better than 'good', 'evil', or 'unclear'.
• Theological note: The bill concerns how courts exercise equitable remedies and the scope of judicial authority, which bears on civil justice, the rule of law, and due regard for those who may be wronged by unlawful government action. Scripture's concern for justice and for the vulnerable makes remedy design relevant, but the bill does not itself directly advance or restrain a named moral evil, so this is an issue of prudential governance rather than a final moral verdict.

Debt and war Cloture and Tier 1 Procedural votes Scoring mechanics