H.R. 4690 (119th): Reliable Federal Infrastructure Act

The bill repeals federal energy efficiency performance standards for new federal buildings and federal buildings undergoing major renovations, including standards that phase out fossil fuel use by FY2030. It directs the Department of Energy to implement the standards as if the phase-out requirements had never taken effect until it issues revised performance standards. It also bars certain green building certification systems from denying federal buildings certification solely based on direct or indirect fossil fuel consumption.

Theological note: The issue touches stewardship of resources and the prudent ordering of public authority over government buildings and energy use. Scripture supports careful stewardship and honest, accountable administration, but it does not settle the specific question of which energy standards government should adopt. The measure raises prudential questions about cost, reliability, and regulatory method rather than a clearly named moral evil.

• Tier: no Tier 1 record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
• Lane: appropriations. Category: corruption_stewardship. Lane tag: general equity.
• Lane: energy_policy. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
• Lane: federal_buildings. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
• Lane: infrastructure. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
• Lane: public_policy. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
• Lane: regulatory_rollback. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
• Tier 1 sign-off: no record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
• Stored polarity: mixed. Only tags the rules mark scoreable on a mixed bill are scored. A yea can draw a penalty or a credit according to the tag. A nay on a tag scored as good can draw a penalty.
• Roll 133: On Motion to Recommit. Vote type: recommit.
• Roll 134: On Passage. Vote type: final_passage.
• Polarity rationale: Reviewed enrichment (llm_import) polarity: The bill is a regulatory rollback of energy performance standards. It does not directly advance a named moral harm or directly restrain one. It combines arguable prudential goods, such as cost control and reliability, with real stewardship and policy-method concerns, so it is best classed as mixed rather than good or evil.
• Theological note: The issue touches stewardship of resources and the prudent ordering of public authority over government buildings and energy use. Scripture supports careful stewardship and honest, accountable administration, but it does not settle the specific question of which energy standards government should adopt. The measure raises prudential questions about cost, reliability, and regulatory method rather than a clearly named moral evil.

Debt and war Cloture and Tier 1 Procedural votes Scoring mechanics