H.R. 845 (119th): Pet and Livestock Protection Act of 2025

H.R. 845 (119th Congress), the Pet and Livestock Protection Act of 2025, directs the Department of the Interior to reissue its November 3, 2020 final rule removing the gray wolf (Canis lupus) in the lower 48 states, except the Mexican wolf subspecies, from the Endangered Species Act list. A federal district court vacated that rule on February 10, 2022, so the gray wolf regained its prior protected status. The bill also bars judicial review of the reissued rule.

Theological note: Scripture grounds human dominion over creatures in stewardship rather than exploitation (Genesis 1:28; Proverbs 12:10), so the protection of endangered species and the protection of livestock both bear on responsible care of creation and of the household's livelihood. Separately, the bill's bar on judicial review raises a question of general equity, since courts serve as a check on executive action and removing that check touches the due ordering of civil authority. This is issue relevance only, not a final candidate judgment.

• Tier: no Tier 1 record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
• Lane: animal_protection. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
• Lane: endangered_species. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
• Lane: environmental_regulation. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
• Lane: livestock_protection. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
• Lane: stewardship. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
• Lane: wildlife_management. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
• Tier 1 sign-off: no record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
• Stored polarity: mixed. Only tags the rules mark scoreable on a mixed bill are scored. A yea can draw a penalty or a credit according to the tag. A nay on a tag scored as good can draw a penalty.
• Roll 359: On Motion to Recommit. Vote type: recommit.
• Roll 360: On Passage. Vote type: final_passage.
• Polarity rationale: Reviewed enrichment (llm_import) polarity: The core dispute is a prudential wildlife-management question: whether the gray wolf has recovered enough to be delisted and how to weigh predator control against livestock losses and species protection. Those are ordinary policy goods on both sides. The bar on judicial review is a real structural concern, since it insulates an agency action from court examination, so the measure is not purely prudential. Neither a direct advancement of moral harm nor a direct restraint of evil is evident, so mixed fits best.
• Theological note: Scripture grounds human dominion over creatures in stewardship rather than exploitation (Genesis 1:28; Proverbs 12:10), so the protection of endangered species and the protection of livestock both bear on responsible care of creation and of the household's livelihood. Separately, the bill's bar on judicial review raises a question of general equity, since courts serve as a check on executive action and removing that check touches the due ordering of civil authority. This is issue relevance only, not a final candidate judgment.

Debt and war Cloture and Tier 1 Procedural votes Scoring mechanics