# H.Res. 1009 (119th): Sets forth the rule for consideration of the bill (H.R

Sets forth the rule for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6945) to amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to clarify the authority of States to use funds for pregnancy centers, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6359) to require institutions of higher education to disseminate information on the rights of, and accommodations and resources for, pregnant students, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 140) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, MN.

## How this bill is scored

Tier: no Tier 1 record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Lane: defends_life. Category: life. Lane tag: command.
Lane: environmental_policy. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: family_policy. Category: children. Lane tag: command.
Lane: house_rules. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: legislative_procedure. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Tier 1 sign-off: no record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Stored polarity: mixed. Only tags the rules mark scoreable on a mixed bill are scored. A yea can draw a penalty or a credit according to the tag. A nay on a tag scored as good can draw a penalty.
Roll 34: On Ordering the Previous Question. Vote type: procedural.
Roll 35: On Agreeing to the Resolution. Vote type: final_passage.
Polarity rationale: Reviewed enrichment (llm_import) polarity: The bundled measures combine a pro-life support measure (pregnancy centers) and a pregnant-student resource measure, which lean toward protecting life and vulnerable persons, with a land-use disapproval that is a prudential environmental and economic dispute. The procedural rule itself directly restrains no named evil and advances no named harm, so the overall classification is mixed rather than good or evil.
Theological note: As a procedural rule, this resolution carries no direct moral verdict. Its bundled measures touch on the protection of unborn life and support for pregnant women, which bear on the dignity of human life and the duty to care for the vulnerable. The public land withdrawal disapproval raises ordinary questions of stewardship and land use that are prudential rather than morally decisive on the summary alone.

## Recorded votes

Roll 34: On Ordering the Previous Question. Yea 212 · Nay 210 · Other 9.
Roll 35: On Agreeing to the Resolution. Yea 213 · Nay 210 · Other 8.

HTML: https://justmeasure.org/bill/hres-1009-119/