# H.Res. 1014 (119th): This resolution provides for the consideration of the bill (H.R

This resolution provides for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 7148) making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7147) making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.

## How this bill is scored

Tier: no Tier 1 record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Lane: appropriations. Category: corruption_stewardship. Lane tag: general equity.
Lane: budget. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: consolidated_appropriations. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: dhs_funding. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: fiscal_responsibility. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: house_rules. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: procedural_rule. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: spending_process. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Tier 1 sign-off: no record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Stored polarity: mixed. Only tags the rules mark scoreable on a mixed bill are scored. A yea can draw a penalty or a credit according to the tag. A nay on a tag scored as good can draw a penalty.
Roll 39: On Ordering the Previous Question. Vote type: procedural.
Roll 40: On Agreeing to the Amendment. Vote type: amendment.
Roll 41: On Agreeing to the Resolution, as Amended. Vote type: final_passage.
Polarity rationale: Reviewed enrichment (llm_import) polarity: The measure is a procedural rule for consideration of appropriations bills. Its basic dispute is prudential, concerning fiscal priorities and process, and the metadata shows no direct advancement or restraint of a named moral harm. Classification as mixed reflects ordinary governance with prudential goods and unresolved concerns about the spending it would enable, rather than a hard moral verdict.
Theological note: The resolution concerns the ordinary stewardship of public funds and legislative procedure. Scripture gives civil authorities the duty to exercise their office justly and to handle public resources with integrity, so the issue is relevant to stewardship and general equity. The resolution itself does not directly advance or restrain a named moral harm, and its moral weight depends on the content of the underlying appropriations bills, which the metadata does not describe.

## Recorded votes

Roll 39: On Ordering the Previous Question. Yea 215 · Nay 213 · Other 3.
Roll 40: On Agreeing to the Amendment. Yea 427 · Nay 0 · Other 4.
Roll 41: On Agreeing to the Resolution, as Amended. Yea 214 · Nay 213 · Other 4.

HTML: https://justmeasure.org/bill/hres-1014-119/