# H.Res. 1115 (119th): This resolution provides for the consideration of the bill (H.R

This resolution provides for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 556) to prohibit the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture from prohibiting the use of lead ammunition or tackle on certain Federal land or water under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1958) to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify that aliens who have been convicted of defrauding the United States Government or the unlawful receipt of public benefits are inadmissible and deportable; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4638) to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide that an alien who has been convicted of harming animals used in law enforcement is inadmissible and deportable, and for other purposes; and relating to consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

## How this bill is scored

Tier: no Tier 1 record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Lane: animal_welfare. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: house_rules. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: hunting_access. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: immigration. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: legislative_procedure. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Tier 1 sign-off: no record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Stored polarity: mixed. Only tags the rules mark scoreable on a mixed bill are scored. A yea can draw a penalty or a credit according to the tag. A nay on a tag scored as good can draw a penalty.
Roll 90: On Ordering the Previous Question. Vote type: procedural.
Roll 91: On Agreeing to the Resolution. Vote type: final_passage.
Polarity rationale: Reviewed enrichment (llm_import) polarity: The rule itself is procedural, but the summary identifies three distinct substantive policy disputes that are ordinary and prudential. The lead-ammunition bill restrains federal agency prohibitions on lawful hunting and fishing, which is a defensible limit on administrative overreach. The immigration bills impose consequences for fraud, benefit abuse, and harm to law-enforcement animals, which are reasonable civil measures with contestable scope. None directly advances moral evil, and none clearly defends justice in a way that settles the matter. The combined package therefore fits mixed rather than unclear.
Theological note: The measure is procedural and sets the agenda for three separate bills. Its issue relevance lies in the prudential questions each bill raises: limits on federal agency power over lawful hunting and fishing, the civil consequences of benefit fraud and immigration status, and the protection of working animals used in public safety. Scripture's concern for stewardship, honest dealing with public resources, and equity toward the sojourner bears on these subjects, but the rule itself makes no direct moral determination.

## Recorded votes

Roll 90: On Ordering the Previous Question. Yea 196 · Nay 192 · Other 44.
Roll 91: On Agreeing to the Resolution. Yea 196 · Nay 193 · Other 43.

HTML: https://justmeasure.org/bill/hres-1115-119/