# H.Res. 1345 (119th): This resolution provides for the consideration of the bill (H.R

This resolution provides for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 8312) to establish fraud prevention and program integrity functions and data sharing authorities within the Department of Treasury and a permanent governmentwide Inspector General for Fraud, Accountability, and Recovery, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8464) to amend title 31, United States Code, to authorize pausing and segmenting payments, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 1335) condemning actors seeking to defraud the United States Government, and expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that governmentwide fraud and improper payment prevention reforms will meaningfully improve the financial prosperity of the United States, and that Federal program eligibility should be verified before payment; and providing for consideration of the bill (S. 2) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of S. Con. Res. 33.

## How this bill is scored

Tier: no Tier 1 record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Lane: data_sharing_review. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: fraud_prevention. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: inspector_general. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: procedural. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: program_integrity. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: reconciliation. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Tier 1 sign-off: no record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Stored polarity: mixed. Only tags the rules mark scoreable on a mixed bill are scored. A yea can draw a penalty or a credit according to the tag. A nay on a tag scored as good can draw a penalty.
Roll 210: On Ordering the Previous Question. Vote type: procedural.
Roll 211: On Agreeing to the Resolution. Vote type: final_passage.
Polarity rationale: Reviewed enrichment (llm_import) polarity: The package combines a legitimate prudential good, preventing fraud and improper payments and creating oversight through an Inspector General, with real concerns about broad data-sharing authority, payment-control powers, and a reconciliation bill whose contents are not described in this metadata. Nothing in the summary directly advances a named moral harm, and nothing clearly restrains one, so a mixed classification is the prudent high-level judgment.
Theological note: The measures concern protecting public funds from fraud and improper payment, a recognized civil good tied to stewardship and equity in the use of entrusted resources. Relevant concerns include whether expanded Treasury data-sharing reaches into private citizens' affairs without adequate limits, and whether payment-pausing powers and reconciliation spending are proportionate and accountable. These are issues for careful prudential review rather than a settled moral verdict on the rule itself.

## Recorded votes

Roll 210: On Ordering the Previous Question. Yea 214 · Nay 211 · Other 5.
Roll 211: On Agreeing to the Resolution. Yea 213 · Nay 211 · Other 6.

HTML: https://justmeasure.org/bill/hres-1345-119/