# H.Res. 977 (119th): This resolution provides for the consideration of the bill (H.R

This resolution provides for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 4593) to amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to revise the definition of showerhead; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5184) to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from enforcing energy efficiency standards applicable to manufactured housing, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6938) making consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes.

## How this bill is scored

Tier: no Tier 1 record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Lane: appropriations. Category: corruption_stewardship. Lane tag: general equity.
Lane: energy_policy. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: house_rules. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: housing_policy. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: legislative_procedure. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Tier 1 sign-off: no record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Stored polarity: mixed. Only tags the rules mark scoreable on a mixed bill are scored. A yea can draw a penalty or a credit according to the tag. A nay on a tag scored as good can draw a penalty.
Roll 2: On Ordering the Previous Question. Vote type: procedural.
Roll 3: On Agreeing to the Resolution. Vote type: final_passage.
Polarity rationale: Reviewed enrichment (llm_import) polarity: The resolution is a procedural rule that schedules ordinary policy and appropriations bills. Its contents combine ordinary prudential goods, such as governing spending and regulating appliance and housing standards, with disputed questions of federal spending and regulatory rollback. No direct moral evil is named, and no clear moral good is directly defended, so the classification is mixed rather than good or evil.
Theological note: The resolution is a procedural vehicle for consideration of appropriations and energy and housing policy. Its issue relevance lies in stewardship of public funds and the ordering of governmental authority, which Scripture treats as a matter of prudence and justice. It does not on its face directly advance or restrain a named moral harm, so it warrants prudential judgment about the underlying measures rather than a hard moral verdict.

## Recorded votes

Roll 2: On Ordering the Previous Question. Yea 213 · Nay 211 · Other 7.
Roll 3: On Agreeing to the Resolution. Yea 214 · Nay 212 · Other 5.

HTML: https://justmeasure.org/bill/hres-977-119/