H.Res. 992 (119th): This resolution provides for the consideration of the bill (H.R

This House resolution provides for floor consideration of H.R. 7006, a bill making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes. The resolution itself is procedural and does not appropriate funds.

Theological note: Public appropriations raise stewardship and justice questions about how the state raises and spends money, and how it provides for the common good. This procedural rule does not itself fund any specific program, so its moral relevance depends on the contents of H.R. 7006, which are not described here.

• Tier: no Tier 1 record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
• Lane: appropriations. Category: corruption_stewardship. Lane tag: general equity.
• Lane: appropriations_process. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
• Lane: budget. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
• Lane: debt_spending. Category: honest_money. Lane tag: prudential.
• Lane: fiscal_responsibility. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
• Lane: government_funding. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
• Lane: house_rules. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
• Lane: omnibus. Category: corruption_stewardship. Lane tag: general equity.
• Lane: procedural_rule. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
• Tier 1 sign-off: no record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
• Stored polarity: mixed. Only tags the rules mark scoreable on a mixed bill are scored. A yea can draw a penalty or a credit according to the tag. A nay on a tag scored as good can draw a penalty.
• Roll 24: On Ordering the Previous Question. Vote type: procedural.
• Roll 25: On Agreeing to the Resolution. Vote type: final_passage.
• Polarity rationale: Reviewed enrichment (llm_import) polarity: Appropriations and floor-procedure measures combine ordinary governmental goods, such as funding government operations, with prudential disputes over spending levels and priorities. The metadata shows no direct advancement or restraint of a named moral harm, so a mixed, prudential classification is appropriate.
• Theological note: Public appropriations raise stewardship and justice questions about how the state raises and spends money, and how it provides for the common good. This procedural rule does not itself fund any specific program, so its moral relevance depends on the contents of H.R. 7006, which are not described here.

Debt and war Cloture and Tier 1 Procedural votes Scoring mechanics monetary injustice economic justice