S.Con.Res. 7 (119th): An original concurrent resolution setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034.
An original concurrent resolution setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034.
senate · Substantive
Rankings updated October 26, 2026, 11:44 AM ET · Votes through September 30, 2026 Exported candidates: 719 | Filings on file, by office: H: 5838 | P: 1467 | S: 1567. These counts include every filing for that office, so they are larger than the ranked list. One person can have more than one filing. Non-voting delegates are left out.
This Senate concurrent resolution sets the congressional budget for FY2025 and budgetary levels for FY2026-FY2034. It recommends levels for revenues, budget authority, outlays, deficits, public debt, debt held by the public, and major functional spending categories. It gives reconciliation instructions directing several House and Senate committees to report legislation that increases or decreases the deficit by specified amounts, with reports due to the budget committee by March 7, 2025. It also creates reserve funds, exempts compliant reconciliation legislation from certain budget points of order, and sets enforcement procedures, including treatment of Social Security and Postal Service administrative expenses.
Theological note: This measure concerns stewardship of public resources and the duty of rulers to govern with prudence, honesty, and care for future generations, as Scripture commends wise management and warns against debt and reckless expenditure. Its moral weight depends on the specific priorities and deficit outcomes it would later enable through reconciliation, which the metadata does not specify, so it is best treated as a prudential matter of fiscal stewardship rather than a direct moral verdict.
Scoring
How this bill is scored
Tier: no Tier 1 record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Lane: appropriations. Category: corruption_stewardship. Lane tag: general equity.
Lane: budget_framework. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: budget_policy. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: debt_spending. Category: honest_money. Lane tag: prudential.
Lane: fiscal_policy. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: fiscal_responsibility. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: fiscal_stewardship. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: government_spending. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Tier 1 sign-off: no record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Stored polarity: mixed. Only tags the rules mark scoreable on a mixed bill are scored. A yea can draw a penalty or a credit according to the tag. A nay on a tag scored as good can draw a penalty.
Roll 58: On the Motion to Proceed S.Con.Res. 7. Vote type: cloture.
Roll 87: On the Concurrent Resolution S.Con.Res. 7. Vote type: final_passage.
Polarity rationale: Reviewed enrichment (llm_import) polarity: A budget framework is a generic fiscal process with real prudential goods (orderly budgeting, fiscal accountability) and genuine concerns (deficit and debt levels, unspecified priorities). It does not directly advance or restrain a named moral harm on the face of the metadata, so 'mixed' is the prudent classification.
Theological note: This measure concerns stewardship of public resources and the duty of rulers to govern with prudence, honesty, and care for future generations, as Scripture commends wise management and warns against debt and reckless expenditure. Its moral weight depends on the specific priorities and deficit outcomes it would later enable through reconciliation, which the metadata does not specify, so it is best treated as a prudential matter of fiscal stewardship rather than a direct moral verdict.