# S.J.Res. 12 (119th): A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting and Exemptions".

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting and Exemptions".

## How this bill is scored

Tier: no Tier 1 record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Lane: emissions_standards. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: energy_policy. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: environmental_protection. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: environmental_regulation. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: regulatory_disapproval. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Tier 1 sign-off: no record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Stored polarity: mixed. Only tags the rules mark scoreable on a mixed bill are scored. A yea can draw a penalty or a credit according to the tag. A nay on a tag scored as good can draw a penalty.
Roll 96: On the Motion to Proceed S.J.Res. 12. Vote type: cloture.
Polarity rationale: Reviewed enrichment (llm_import) polarity: The rule restricts waste emissions through a charge tied to thresholds, which plausibly restrains harm to air and neighbors, so disapproval would remove a restraint. However, the dispute concerns the scope, cost, and design of an environmental regulatory program, which is a prudential matter rather than a direct moral evil. Under the framework, this combines ordinary prudential concerns with real environmental goods and is therefore mixed.
Theological note: The issue touches stewardship of creation and the responsible use of natural resources, along with the duty to avoid waste and harm to neighbors, which Scripture commends. It also raises prudential questions about how government should weigh energy production, economic burden, and environmental protection, which Scripture does not settle directly. This is issue relevance only, not a final candidate judgment.

## Recorded votes

Roll 96: On the Motion to Proceed S.J.Res. 12. Yea 52 · Nay 47 · Other 1.

HTML: https://justmeasure.org/bill/sjres-12-119/