# S.J.Res. 34 (119th): A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Government of Israel of certain defense articles and services.

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Government of Israel of certain defense articles and services.

## How this bill is scored

Tier: no Tier 1 record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Lane: arms_sales. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: de_escalation. Category: war_peace. Lane tag: prudential.
Lane: foreign_military_sale. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: foreign_policy. Category: war_peace. Lane tag: prudential.
Lane: israel. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: prudential_foreign_policy. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Tier 1 sign-off: no record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Stored polarity: mixed. Only tags the rules mark scoreable on a mixed bill are scored. A yea can draw a penalty or a credit according to the tag. A nay on a tag scored as good can draw a penalty.
Roll 455: On the Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 34. Vote type: discharge.
Polarity rationale: Reviewed enrichment (llm_import) polarity: Disapproving an arms sale restrains a specific military transfer and may be read as restraining complicity in harm, which points toward good. However, the metadata names no concrete atrocity or unjust-killing target, and arms-transfer policy toward an ally is a contested prudential matter involving security, deterrence, and alliance commitments. Under the framework, this combines a restraining act with real prudential disagreement, so 'mixed' fits better than 'good' or 'evil'.
Theological note: The measure bears on the Christian duty to weigh the use of state-authorized force by the standards of just cause, proportion, and the protection of noncombatants. Arms transfers can implicate complicity in armed conflict, but the metadata does not establish that this sale would facilitate a specific unjust killing, so the issue is one of prudential judgment under general equity rather than a settled moral verdict.

## Recorded votes

Roll 455: On the Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 34. Yea 24 · Nay 73 · Other 3.

HTML: https://justmeasure.org/bill/sjres-34-119/