Bill

S.J.Res. 76 (119th): A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Extension of Deadlines in Standards of Performance for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources: Oil and Natural Gas Sector Climate Review Final Rule".

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Extension of Deadlines in Standards of Performance for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources: Oil and Natural Gas Sector Climate Review Final Rule".

senate · Procedural

Rankings updated October 26, 2026, 11:44 AM ET · Votes through September 30, 2026
Exported candidates: 719 | Filings on file, by office: H: 5838 | P: 1467 | S: 1567. These counts include every filing for that office, so they are larger than the ranked list. One person can have more than one filing. Non-voting delegates are left out.

Recorded summary

This joint resolution under the Congressional Review Act would nullify the EPA rule titled 'Extension of Deadlines in Standards of Performance for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources: Oil and Natural Gas Sector Climate Review Final Rule,' published July 31, 2025. The rule extended compliance deadlines for performance standards covering control devices, equipment leaks, storage vessels, process controllers, and vent systems at oil and natural gas facilities, delayed the implementation date of the Methane Super Emitter Program, and extended a state plan submittal deadline. Enactment would restore the deadlines that applied before those extensions. A yea vote is a vote to nullify the rule.

EPAclimate_reviewenergyenvironmentenvironmental_regulationregulatory_policy

Theological note: The issue touches stewardship of God's creation and the duty to prevent unnecessary harm to neighbors through pollution, weighed against the lawful development of energy and the prudential question of how quickly regulatory deadlines should bind industry. Scripture supports both faithful stewardship of the earth and honest, orderly work, so the measure raises prudential rather than direct moral questions. It is not a final candidate judgment.

How this bill is scored

Recorded votes

Roll 622 · November 19, 2025, 05:59 PM · On the Motion to Proceed S.J.Res. 76 · Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-51)

Yea 46 · Nay 51 · Other 3

Yea

Nay

Other

All bills · Markdown