# S.J.Res. 80 (119th): A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska Integrated Activity Plan Record of Decision".

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska Integrated Activity Plan Record of Decision".

## How this bill is scored

Tier: no Tier 1 record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Lane: energy_policy. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: environmental_protection. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: land_management. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: land_use. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: resource_use. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: subsistence. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Tier 1 sign-off: no record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Stored polarity: mixed. Only tags the rules mark scoreable on a mixed bill are scored. A yea can draw a penalty or a credit according to the tag. A nay on a tag scored as good can draw a penalty.
Roll 296: On Passage. Vote type: final_passage.
Roll 595: On the Motion to Proceed S.J.Res. 80. Vote type: cloture.
Roll 599: On the Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 80. Vote type: final_passage.
Polarity rationale: Reviewed enrichment (llm_import) polarity: The measure combines legitimate energy development and resource-access interests with real concerns about wildlife habitat and subsistence protections. It does not directly advance a named moral harm or directly restrain one. The dispute is a prudential land-use balance, so a mixed classification fits.
Theological note: Stewardship of creation and care for the common good, including provision for subsistence communities and wildlife, are relevant to this issue. Energy development and resource access are also legitimate goods under prudent stewardship. The question is a prudential balance between these considerations, not a direct moral evil such as the oppression of persons, so it is not a final candidate judgment.

## Recorded votes

Roll 296: On Passage. Yea 216 · Nay 209 · Other 8.
Roll 595: On the Motion to Proceed S.J.Res. 80. Yea 54 · Nay 46 · Other 0.
Roll 599: On the Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 80. Yea 52 · Nay 45 · Other 3.

HTML: https://justmeasure.org/bill/sjres-80-119/